Asbestos Related Diseases.


Health problems surfaced as early as 1900,
but since the latency stage of lung disease related to asbestos is usually 20 years or more,
the magnitude of the problem did not appear until recently,
despite studies worldwide.

I began this site ten years ago and after 5-6 years I did not have it up and running due to other events in my life. Consequently the figures showing through this site could be well under the actual figures now showing.

Since world production of 50,000 tons
annually 30 years ago skyrocketed to
3 million tons recently,
the health effects may not be fully known until the end of this century.
Hundreds of thousands workers
and their families have been exposed
to harmful levels of contamination.

Diseases related to asbestos can be sorted into different classes.

There are malignant (or cancerous) ones such as mesothelioma and lung cancer.
Then you have the non-malignant ( benign or non-cancerous) such as asbestosis; pleural plaques, diffuse pleural fibrosis and benign pleural effusions

The diseases for which asbestos exposure is a generally accepted cause are mesothelioma, asbestosis, small airway fibrosis, pleural fibrosis, pleural effusions and many lung cancers.

Mesothelioma occurs almost uniquely in individuals exposed to asbestos. This is then separated into three sites. The pleura, the peritoneum and the tunica vaginalis testis.
Lung cancer is strongly associated with smoking
If the asbestos exposure is sufficient however, the incidence of lung cancer is higher than expected from the smoking effect alone

For lung cancer in asbestos workers, asbestosis is not a prerequisite for recognition as an occupational related disease.
The intensity and duration of exposure to asbestos are factors associated with higher risk of lung cancer

These factors can be estimated on the basis of the work history or, when necessary, by analysing mineral dust from available lung tissue.

 The following is an article from The Otago Daily Times, printed on the 3rd April 2009

Women warned of talcum powder danger
Home » News » World
Sun, 28 Sep 2008
News: World | Health

Women have been warned to immediately stop using talcum powder around their genitals in the wake of research which suggests particles may travel to the ovaries and trigger a process of inflammation that allows cancer cells to flourish.
Although previous studies have raised concerns over talc, the latest findings from the United States suggest women who use it are 40 percent more likely to get ovarian cancer... a much greater risk than first thought... The Telegraph newspaper reported.
The findings, published in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, apply only to talcum powder used around the private parts, not on the rest of the body
Experts from Harvard Medical School in Boston studied more than 3000 women and found using talc merely once a week raised the risk of ovarian cancer by 36 percent, rising to 41 percent for those applying powder every day.
Dr Maggie Gates, who led the study, said that until the outcome of further research women should avoid using talc in the genital area.
One alternative is cornstarch powder.

The study revealed that the risks were greater still for those with a certain genetic profile.
Women carrying a gene called glutathione S-transferase M1, or GSTM1, but lacking a gene called glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1), were nearly three times as likely to develop tumours.

Around one in 10 Caucasian women are thought to have this genetic profile, putting them at sharply increased risk.
Ovarian cancer is often termed the silent cancer, as it grows quietly and is often only detected at the final stages, and it is the fourth biggest killer of all cancers for New Zealand women.
About 312 new cases are diagnosed annually with 173 deaths.
Until now, it has been thought the main risk factors included a family history of the disease, having already had breast cancer and starting periods at a young age.
Women who are overweight or use hormone replacement therapy are also thought to be more at risk.

Talc is made from a soft mineral called hydrous magnesium silicate, which is found throughout the world.
It is crushed, dried and milled to produce powder used in cosmetic products by millions.
Some experts say it has chemical similarities to asbestos, which can cause a deadly form of lung cancer.
Laboratory tests show ovarian cells exposed to talc divide more rapidly - a characteristic sign of cancer.
Until recently there was no proof that powder could travel through a woman's reproductive tract as far as the pelvis and then on to the ovaries.
But last year, a separate group of doctors at Harvard Medical School identified tiny particles of powder in the pelvis of a 68-year-old woman with advanced ovarian cancer who had used talc every day for 30 years.


As if we didn't already know how deadly asbestos is, here's more ammunition for the need for a ban and for research into treatment for those already exposed. 

 Asbestos workers face increased risk of cancer death.

  Workers who have been exposed to asbestos on the job are more likely to die from lung cancers, mesothelioma, and asbestosis, as well as from stomach cancer and stroke, according to one of the longest-running studies of British asbestos workers, published in Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
On the positive side, more stringent asbestos regulations appear to be reducing the risk of asbestos-related diseases among younger workers.

Since the early part of the 20th century, asbestos-related diseases have been the leading cause of job-related deaths in Great Britain, and the number of deaths has been on the rise.
Although Britain has enacted stricter laws governing the use of industrial asbestos, exposed workers will likely continue to develop deadly cancers in the years to come.
Since 1971, researchers in England have been studying British asbestos workers to determine what effects asbestos regulations have had on their health over the long-term. Unlike past occupational research, the current study looked at workers from across various asbestos industries, including asbestos manufacturing, insulation, and removal.
The study included nearly 100,000 asbestos workers (most of them male) who completed surveys and were followed up from 1971 to 2005. When the study began, most of the participants worked in the manufacturing industry. By 2005, the majority worked in asbestos removal.

“To our knowledge, there is no other occupational study of removal workers; since these comprise the large majority of workers in the modern asbestos industry in Great Britain, information on these workers is particularly valuable,” says lead study author Anne-Helen Harding, PhD, a researcher with the Health and Safety Laboratory in Derbyshire, England.
Asbestos workers overall faced a 41 percent higher risk of death from all causes than the general population, the study found. They were more likely to die from cancers of the lung, peritoneum (abdominal lining), pleura (lung lining), as well as from mesothelioma and asbestosis (lung scarring). Workers in insulation generally faced the highest risk, and asbestos removal workers the second-highest risk for lung cancer, pleural and peritoneal cancers, and mesothelioma.

The study also found a link between occupational asbestos exposure and deaths from stroke and stomach cancer. “Elevated risks of stroke and stomach cancer have been reported previously, but the evidence for a causal association with asbestos exposure is inconclusive,” Dr. Harding says. “Establishing a link with asbestos exposure can be difficult.”
It can be hard to distinguish asbestos exposure from other established risk factors for these diseases, such as smoking (more than half of the participants were smokers). Another challenge in establishing a link is the long lag time between asbestos exposure and illness. It can take up to 40 years after exposure for asbestos workers to be diagnosed with cancer.

That long latency period may be why study participants who started work earlier were more likely to die from cancer or lung disease. Workers who were first exposed to asbestos after 1959 faced a lower risk than those who started working earlier.
This finding also suggests that more stringent laws, including a 1999 ban on the use of most new asbestos products in the UK, have had some benefit.
The phasing out of asbestos-based products is likely to lead to a drop in the incidence of asbestos-related diseases, although these diseases will continue to be diagnosed as workers are exposed to the asbestos that remains in ships, buildings, and other industrial sites, according to Dr. Harding.

Even though occupational asbestos exposures are somewhat different in the United States, the results of this study are still relevant to workers in this country, Dr. Harding says. As asbestos workers continue to be diagnosed with lung cancers and mesothelioma, the risk of occupational asbestos exposure will remain an important issue on both sides of the pond.

Source:
Harding AH, Darnton A, Wegerdt J, McElvenny D.
Mortality among British asbestos workers undergoing regular medical examinations (1971-2005).
Occup Environ Med. 2009 Mar 1. [Epub ahead of print]

I have lung cancer but I smoked; does my asbestos exposure matter?

Yes. Physicians who are knowledgeable about asbestos-related diseases will tell you that asbestos exposure and cigarette smoking are a lethal combination. Alone, either cigarette smoking or asbestos exposure can cause lung cancer. For a person who has been exposed to asbestos and smoked, the risk is greatly magnified. Asbestos exposure has been determined to be a substantial contributing factor in the development of lung cancer for those who smoked.

The number of lung cancer cases caused by asbestos is—at least statistically—relatively small, with smoking accounting for 90% of all lung cancer cases and asbestos only 2 to 5%. While the most common cause of lung cancer is tobacco use, the combination of asbestos exposure and smoking, is a deadly mix, greatly increasing a person's risk of developing lung cancer, which the following chart reveals.

Hammond EC, Selikoff IJ, Seidman H. Asbestos exposure, cigarette smoking and death rates. Ann NY Acad Sci 1979; 330:473-491

Group

Smoking

Mortality Ratio

Control

No

1.0

Asbestos Workers

No

5.2

Control

Yes

10.9

Asbestos Workers

Yes

53.9

 

It is estimated that about eight million people have been exposed to asbestos over the last half a century in the USA alone during various manufacturing processes.
In New Zealand estimates have put the total number of people employed in asbestos cement manufacture on it's own over the last fifty years at anything up to eight thousand. There are many other types of employment involving asbestos

In some groups of people who were heavily exposed to asbestos, up to 20 to 25% of all deaths are due to lung cancer. (In the general population, lung cancer causes only 5% of all deaths)

How many people out there have been diagnosed with lung cancer and never been asked if they were exposed to asbestos? Especially if they smoked.

Each of these diseases can only be diagnosed through medical examinations and tests.

Because you have been exposed to asbestos; does not mean you have or will have an asbestos-related disease.
What it does mean though, is you should be.

1) Careful of your health.

2) Make sure your G.P. is aware of your exposure to asbestos.

3) Receive regular check-ups.

4) If you smoke , try and give it up.
( smoking greatly increases the risk of lung cancer in asbestos workers,)

According to the National Cancer Institute, among some groups of workers who were heavily exposed to asbestos, as much as 20 to 25% of all deaths are due to lung cancer.
( In the general population, lung cancer causes only 5% of all deaths.)

SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS.

(Pleural Mesothelioma)

If you have been exposed to asbestos and experience any of the following signs and symptoms, please inform your doctor.
Your doctor should be informed about your exposure anyway.

a) Shortness of breath on exertion.

b) Dry irritating cough.

c) Unexplained pains in chest or abdomen.

d) Tightness in the chest.

e) Nail abnormalities.

f) Unexplained incidences of flu-like
symptoms or pneumonia.

g) Unexplained tiredness.

h) Malaise (bodily weakness)

i) Unexplained weight loss.

j) Coldness/ tingling of extremities.

k) Asbestos warts.

l) Benign pleural effusions.

m) Deep sighing or continuous yawning.

n) Stiffness in neck region.

o) Difficulty in swallowing.

p) Unusual breathing habits
while sleeping.

I have put this list in as they were some of the signs that Thom had been showing for some time but no one could find what was wrong with him

I would be interested in any signs and symptoms that you have experienced before you were diagnosed with Mesothelioma or any asbestos related disease and the length of time you had them.

SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS.

(Peritoneal Mesothelioma)

Peritoneal mesothelioma can lay dormant in the system for many decades like all the other forms of asbestos related diseases.
Because of this, it is more difficult to diagnose as it is sometimes hard to make the connection of your exposure to asbestos.

The symptoms can easily be mistaken for other more common diseases and so many victims are incorrectly diagnosed,
or by the time they are diagnosed the disease has already advanced and treatment is more difficult.

a) Abdominal pain, acute to severe

b) Swelling of the abdominal area due to fluid being retained.

c) Breathing difficulties.

d) Loss of appetite and because of this, loss of weight.

e) Bowel obstruction

f) Nausea

g) Vomiting.

h) Weakness

i) Fever.

j) Anaemia


Please E-Mail me with any information you would like to share and have on this website.
Thank you very much, Regards from Deidre.


Mom,(all in black) looks on absolutely disgusted that her kids just won't listen to her warnings about what smoking will do to their health.


What Is Hope
The Bad News
What Is Asbestos
What I Hope To Do
Specialists in Mesothelioma. USA
Stories
New Stories
Poems And Verses
Health Sites
E-Mail Me